Skip to content

Posts from the ‘Media’ Category

4000+ Global Nurses in Melbourne to focus on equity & access to health care

CHMP Co-directors, Diana Mason and Barbara Glickstein, are attending the International Council of Nurses 25th Quadrennial Congress 18-23 May 2013 in Melbourne, Australia. In addition to reporting on the proceedings they will be participating on a panel titled, The Strategic Use of Media to Shape Health Policy, where they will discuss the work of the Center for Health Media and Policy.

photo of ICN media room

We’ve arrived. It was quite a journey from NYC to LA to Melbourne. We left on Wednesday and arrived on Friday. Thursday just disappeared.  Closest thing to space travel.

The ICN Media Centre will be our base with media folks from around the world here to report on the Congress. When I asked at the media desk check-in what hashtag we should use for the Congress I was disappointed to find out that  one had not been assigned.  A few tweets using #ICN13 followed by a search on Twitter found three hashtags circulating- #ICN13, #ICN2013, #ICNAust2013.  Oh well, it’s a step forward. Four years ago in South Africa only a couple of us were on Twitter. Progress. Slow, but progress.

Student Power

ICN Student plenary The first session I attended was the Nursing Student Assembly.  Student presenters addressed issues on education, technology, access to care in rural areas and advancing the practice of nursing. I was particularly moved by the students interest in developing more clinical placements in rural areas to address the lack of access to primary care in regions locally and globally. One student reported repeated requests at her university to expand clinical placements in rural areas only to be met with resistance. Her response. She created an independent health promotion elective and forged ahead. Other students followed. The message repeated throughout this session is that student nurses are powerful  individually and collectively and are making a difference. They encouraged each other not to wait until you finish your degree and get your license but to make an impact now to address health disparities and inequity.

These student nurses are smart, bold nurse activists. They are nurse leaders with a serious commitment to address equity and access to health care.

 

Barbara Glickstein reporting from ICN 2013 Melbourne, Australia

Nurses Respond to Educate Family Nurse Practitioners in Haiti

This post was written by Jennifer De Jesus a student in the Macaulay Honors College at Hunter and an avid movie watcher. She is also an employee of the Health Professions Education Center, which has one of the largest collection of health films in the New York City area.

photocredit:Promoting Health in Haiti

photocredit:Promoting Health in Haiti

It has been three years and three days since the tragic 7.0 earthquake in Haiti claimed the lives of an estimated 316,000, injured 300,000 and left an overwhelming 1,000,000 homeless. The devastation only seemed to continue, as days and weeks following the earthquake only revealed an even more alarming and frightening reality.

Easily lost behind the constant coverage of the earthquake’s impact was one event that has shaped the lives of thousands of Haitians and is undermining great efforts to rebuild the country. Frontline’s “Battle for Haiti” focuses on the criminals that escaped Haiti’s National Penitentiary the night of the earthquake. The majority of these criminals were gang bosses and kidnappers, which were only jailed in the first place by an all-out military onslaught by the Haitian police and armed United Nations peacekeepers between 2004-2007. Now dispersed throughout Haiti, these criminals are once again creating an atmosphere of fear and violence in an already extremely difficult environment. Read more

A Case For Interprofessional Exchange In Family Medicine

This is a repost from today’s Primary Care Progress. HealthCetera and Primary Care Progress are modeling that interprofessional exchange matters to advance the public’s health.  We’re celebrating Nurses Week together. 

The IOM’s 2010 report The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health called for “nurses [to] be full partners, with physicians and other health care professionals, in redesigning health care in the United States.”  We need a culture of collaboration and interprofessionalism in education and practice. Here, an R.N. makes the case for interprofessionalism in family medicine in this post that originally ran in 2012 on STFM’s blog.

courtney-kasunBy Courtney Kasun, R.N., M.N.Sc.

One year ago, I began teaching in an interprofessional student clinic.  The student clinic itself had been around for decades, staffed by students in our family medicine clerkship.  However, after a recent campus-wide push for more interprofessional education across health care disciplines, we began adding nursing and pharmacy students to our clinic and having all the students see patients as an interprofessional team. Read more

Charles Cullen, The Good Nurse and The Good Organization

Journalist Charles Graeber

Journalist Charles Graeber

I met Charles Graeber, an award-winning journalist, about 5 or 6 years ago through a colleague at the American Journal of Nursing who was his friend. She told me he was working on a very interesting story and would benefit from talking with me. Over lunch, Graeber told me that he was investigating the circumstances surrounding the 16 years of scores of killings by Charles Cullen as a registered nurse. I recalled news reports surrounding Cullen’s arrest at the end of 2003, when press referred to him as the “Angel of Death” because he had injected patients with deadly doses of cardiac drugs, insulin and other powerful medications that are usually used to save lives, not end them. Sometimes his killing was random. Other times, it was carefully planned. The story was disturbing and I worried about how this might affect how the public viewed nurses. One rogue nurse could undermine the public’s confidence in all.

Graeber has published his investigation in a new book, The Good Nurse: A True Story of Medicine, Madness, and Murder,published by Twelve, an imprint of the Hatchette Book Group. I finished the book right before last night’s 60 Minutes aired a half-hour report on Graeber’s investigation and included an interview with Cullen. While the 60 Minutes story illustrates some of the key points in Graeber’s book, it falls short of capturing just how complicit the multiple hospitals were in not reporting their suspicions of Cullen to the state board of nursing or the police. In fact, Graeber’s careful recounting of phone and in-person recordings and depositions shows two hospitals actually resisting detectives’ attempts to gain information and obtain Pyxis records, patient charts, or personnel files.

What had been disturbing to me became appalling. Why would hospitals simply boot Cullen out the door with the promise of a neutral reference, even when it was clear to them that he was involved in patient deaths? Why would they not report it to the state board of nursing, even if they thought the deaths were from errors that Cullen had made? And why would they shut down one of their own nurses, Pat Medellin, who was working at St. Luke’s Hospital in Fountain Hill (Bethlehem), PA, at the time and who had made the connection between Cullen and deaths on her unit? The hospital administration told Medellin that their investigation of Cullen was closed. Medellin had the courage to alert the police anyway. And it took another courageous nurse, Amy Loughren (now Ridgeway), to help detectives get a confession out of her former colleague, Cullen.

Edie Brous, RN, JD, a nurse attorney and former president of The American Association of Nurse Attorneys, told me that the hospitals likely feared the media coverage if Cullen’s murders became public. They would worry about their liability exposure, their reputation in a competitive market, and the impact on donations to their institutions.

At the end of The Good Nurse, Graeber notes that the New Jersey legislature passed two laws in 2004 in response to the Cullen killings. One is the Patient Safety Act and then the Health Care Professional Responsibility and Reporting Enhancement Act. Together, these laws require hospitals to report “serious preventable adverse events” to the Deparment of Health and Human Services, report nurses’ performance problems to the state board of nursing, and maintain records related to patient complaints about staff for seven years. The laws give hospitals a measure of protection from civil liability. But Graeber also notes that there are not teeth to the laws–they do not include penalties for hospitals that don’t comply.

After reading the book, I’m left wondering why the attorneys general for PA and NJ would not investigate hospital administrators whose actions could constitute aiding and abetting a criminal and covering up knowledge of a crime. Because the hospitals didn’t report Cullen when he was still in their employ, he went on to kill more patients. Graeber estimates that as many as 300 patients died at Cullen’s hand, making him possibly the most prolific serial killer in the nation’s history. But the hospitals that let him go quietly from their institutions without even alerting the police and state board of nursing bear some responsibility for subsequent deaths by Cullen. They put their own reputations and interests before the wellbeing and protection of patients.

Diana J. Mason, PhD, RN, FAAN, Rudin Professor of Nursing

Primary care physician shortage requires system overhaul and clearer focus on patients, panel says

This guest post is written by Carolyn Crist a freelance writer pursuing her master’s degree in Health and Medical Journalism at the University of Georgia.  She graduated from UGA in 2010 with degrees in newspapers and English and worked as an education and political reporter.

Carolyn Crist

Primary care doctors are in short supply in the United States, and the trend will worsen unless problems with access, pay, and training are addressed.

The challenge of making primary care available for all is complex, but using technology, reworking the medical school curriculum, and employing a team-based approach to patient care could be the answer.

The conversation certainly isn’t new, and it continues to happen nationally as physician groups are testing ideas. The best solutions so far are encouraging health professionals to work to the top of their licenses, said a panel of experts discussing the “team-based” approach to primary care at the Association of Healthcare Journalists conference held in Boston.

“You have dissatisfied patients who can’t navigate the health care system, providers who are frustrated with the way they practice, and a health care system that is ready to implode,” said Jane Maffie-Lee, a nurse practitioner and program director of Massachusetts General Hospital’s Ambulatory Practice of the Future. “In some primary care settings, service is terrible and people don’t smile. Something has to happen.”

The current reimbursement system for primary care forces doctors to cram more patients into their workday to battle relatively low pay rates, she noted. At the same time, quality seems to be falling as overall costs increase, which deters patients from primary care offices and instead takes them straight to specialists’ doors.

About five years ago, Mass General created the ambulatory service that Maffie-Lee directs as a way to engage people in their own care through electronic medical records, teams, and new technology. Care is provided by teams of doctors and nurses who share responsibilities, enabling nurses to do more than in traditional doctor-centered practices. The system is working well so far, Maffie-Lee said.

“Patients have easy access to their records and can participate, and the providers focus their practice on health and wellness, asking patients about exercise, diet, and well-being each visit,” she said. “It’s important to have this culture of collaboration and engage the patients in their weight concerns rather than telling them to just lose 40 pounds, for example.”

In Rhode Island, Coastal Medical Inc. is trying a similar team-based approach to medicine. With 19 offices, 100 providers, and 100,000 patients, the group is driven by data and the desire to give patients access to care, said Alan Kurose, president and chief executive officer.

“All of this is underway and helping, but we have a long way to go,” he said.

Nurses, case managers, pharmacists, and medical assistants are all on the same team. The teams cover weekends and holidays, and urgent care clinics stay open outside normal business hours.

Though Coastal’s approach hasn’t been extensively studied yet, team-based care is showing positive results, Kurose said. In a separate panel on health care costs and quality, Donald Berwick, former head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said the best examples are emerging from community efforts rather than policymakers. He cited a health care project in Alaska, where team-based care has lowered hospital inpatient stays by 50 percent, reduced emergency department admissions by 53 percent and cut specialty visits by 63 percent.

As promising as team-based care appears, policy changes are also essential. Health professionals and politicians must address the health care system as a whole — a daunting task, said Andrew Ellner, co-director of the Harvard Center for Primary Care and a practicing internist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

“The basic problem is that our system is built around doctors versus built around people, and that’s not just patients but nurses and medical assistants as well,” he said. “We need a culture transformation and a hardware redesign.”

Ellner proposed that health care be rethought by focusing on people, technology, and space. Collaborating in teams to deliver care is a start, but health providers also need to use technology to its fullest extent. Smartphone applications and mobile devices can link providers and patients more closely, enabling patients to better manage their own health.

“We’ve only begun to scratch the surface in how this can be implemented effectively,” he said, and a redesign of the traditional payment system is also imperative. Use of interactive technology will  spread only if providers can be compensated for work outside traditional office and clinic settings.

With a team effort to manage the work load, doctors can help more patients than ever before, he said. Only then can physicians return to the true “art of medicine” by analyzing data from their patients and studying populations in their community as a whole.

“Imagine physicians being able to use technology to pick up the signal from the noise,” Ellner said. “Imagine them not waiting until patients come to them — at the most costly and sick time of care — and instead take action.”

While changes in day-to-day practice are certainly helpful, ultimately, medical school curriculum and culture must also change, said Andrew Morris-Singer, a primary care doctor and founder of Primary Care Progress, an organization that spreads information about primary care and trains doctors and other professionals to advocate for changes in health care.

“There’s an established culture of promoting specialties in medical school, and then there’s concern about higher pay, medical school debt, and the work-life balance,” Morris-Singer said. “The other half of the story is the actual training and courses because we’re not teaching students to recognize and treat the problems faced by the majority of patients.”

Doctors in training are taught to address the rarest and sickest of patients who are admitted to elite teaching hospitals, yet they may not be able to diagnose a common skin rash, he added.

“We’ve got to fix this, and we’ve go to fix it soon,” Morris-Singer said.

                                                                                                                     This guest post is written by Carolyn Crist.

Healthstyles 4-part special starts tonight – April is Health Care Decision month

Advance Directives and Health Care Proxies

There is one thing that is certain and that we all have in common: all of us will die. But how we die may depend upon the decisions that each of us makes. How would you answer the following questions?

  1. Do you have an ‘advance directive’? Do you know what this is and why it’s important?
  2. Do you have a ‘health care proxy’ or ‘agent’?
  3. Have you talked with your loved ones about what is important to you regarding end-of-life care?
  4. Would you want to be resuscitated if you were terminally ill and your heart stopped beating?
  5. Would you want artificial hydration and nutrition if you were terminally ill and couldn’t make health care decisions for yourself?

If you don’t have clear answers to these questions, you’re not alone. We live in a death-denying society that seldom has open and honest conversations about dying. But these conversations are crucial for trying to make sure that health care providers and your loved ones will make the right decisions about your health care if you are incapacitated.

April is Health Care Decision Month—a time to all of us to reflect on some of the decisions that we or our loved ones might confront around how we die. In keeping with this theme, Healthstyles is focusing its four programs this month on how to have the conversations about how we want to die and how to take the legal steps in ensuring that others respect our wishes.

The first program airs tonight on WBAI, 99.5 FM (www.wbai.org) and focuses on why these issues are important. New York’s Family Health Care Decision Act is discussed as an example of legal protections that were developed with good intentions but fall short of being able to make sure that a family member is acting in your best interests, if you can’t make your own health care decisions. We share web resources that can be used by people from any state in the US to find out about specific laws and documents that pertain to protecting your health care rights.

The second program will focus on how to have the conversation about your health care wishes with someone who will serve as your agent, in the event you are unable to make these decisions for yourself. The third program will walk you through how to complete an advance directive and health care proxy form, as well as tell you how to make it available to health care providers. The last program will discuss other legal documents related to end-of-life care, such as the POLST—Provider Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment—and the Do Not Resuscitate documents.

For the entire series, Healthstyles producers Barbara Glickstein, RN, MPH, and Diana Mason, RN, PhD, talk with Tina Janssen-Spinosa, JD, Staff Attorney for the New York Legal Assistance Group where she is Program Coordinator for Total Life Choices, an initiative to disseminate information about end of life planning and help people in their planning needs; and Vidette Todaro-Franceschi, RN, PhD, Professor of Nursing at Hunter College, City University of New York, and expert in end of life issues.

So tune in each Thursday evening from 11:00 to 11:30 this month to listen in on this important series of programs. You can listen to tonight’s program by clicking D&D_0001 (1)

Remember that planning for the end of our lives is about planning for how we want to live.

Healthstyles is sponsored by the Center for Health, Media & Policy at Hunter College.

Kevin Ware – Inspires athletes & non-athletes

On Sunday evening during the Louisville Cardinal vs Duke NCAA Elite Eight tournament game millions of television viewers witnessed Louisville Cardinal sophomore guard Kevin Ware’s awkward fall to the ground, after trying to block a 3-point shot, resulting in a compound fracture of his leg that left his teammates in tears. He was removed from the court, the game went on after a 9 minute delay, and Louisville won. The Louisville Cardinals are headed to the Final Four.

For the most part, broadcast media maintained Mr. Ware’s respect for privacy and the viewers from seeing replays of his fall and close-ups of his compound fracture. Social media went wild with tweets.

Colorlines  respectfully published A Non-Grotesque Picture From Louisville’s Kevin Ware Hospital Room. MSNBC’s new primetime anchor Chris Hayes, in his first All In program covered the story addressing a bigger policy issue, Are NCAA players uncompensated employees of the organization?  Of the many points he raised is this one, “if college basketball players are paid in scholarship dollars, what happens when an athlete is out the game? And who foots the medical bills- the “employer” (the college) or the student and his family?”

Reports today state that his medical bills will be covered.

Last night, by email,  I received the poem published below, Sport Is, written by my son, Ezra Ellenberg, a junior at the University of Maryland at College Park. He’s an athlete and a sports enthusiast.  He hosts a radio show, The Dugout Binder, on WMUC Sports, the college campus station.  He and his co-host,  Sung-Min Kim, evaluate teams and transactions based on sabermetrics and other advanced statistics. (A front page article in today’s NY Times talks about this new era of of baseball stats and sports reporting).

I think it sheds light on the many ways this young man, Kevin Ware, has touched us.  Athletes and non-athletes alike.

 We wish Mr. Ware a complete and full recovery.

Sport Is

Sport is beautiful.

Sport is raw.

Sport is emotion.

Sport is a freak accident.

Sport is seeing your brother go down.

Sport is knowing how hard he worked, only to have it all disappear.

Sport is collapsing.

Sport is tears.

Sport is disbelief and denial.

Sport is a huddle.

Sport is relying on your coach, your basketball father, who has been there before.

Sport is looking to his eyes for an answer.

Sport is seeing none.

Sport is kneeling next to your broken brother, drawing on every ounce of courage you have saying “don’t look down, stay with me, you’re ok, I’m here.”

Sport is pulling team mates closer, even those who can’t bear to look.

Sport is crouching, laying, kneeling next to him while he’s in agony.

Sport is weeping openly with your country watching.

But laying on your back, half dazed, half in agony, knowing your career could be over… telling your team mates “don’t worry about me, guys. Just win.”

That is more than sport.

That is superhuman.

That is heroic.

That transcends.

That moves people.

That moves me.

That makes me believe.

Sport is nine minutes of waiting, terrified.

Sport is wiping those tears

Sport is underperforming

Then, Sport is a jolt

Sport is a recalibration of focus

Sport is a reason

Sport is playing with a new found purpose

Sport is pressure

Sport is blitzing your opponent after halftime

Sport is seizing

Sport is the undeniable feeling that you are destined

Sport is ‘not today, Duke’

Sport is winning for Kevin

Sport is the final buzzer

Sport is throwing your hands in the air, triumphant at last

Sport is holding your brother in your heart because you can’t hold him in your arms

Sport is a moment

Sport is wearing his jersey with a smile on your face

Sport is ‘we’re bringing this home’

Sport is ‘no one’s fuckin stopin us now’

Sport is bringing him the trophy

Sport is telling him how proud you are, taking his head to rest on your shoulder

Sport is rehabilitation

Sport is a wheelchair, then a cast, then walking, then running, then jumping

Sport is feeling that first bead of sweat forming… and smiling

Sport is seeing the ball go in for the first time in too damn long

Sport is the weight room

Sport is the swimming pool

the sauna

the elastic band

the medicine ball

the scar tissue

the massage

the PT

Sport is the practice court

Sport is the press conference

Sport is checking in and hearing your name announced

Sport is the home crowd roaring with pleasure like so many proud relatives

Sport is ‘I’m back’

Kevin Ware– You Are Sport

by Ezra Ellenberg

Follow him on Twitter @ezraellenberg

 

The Sweet Tooth: Bliss Now, Pay Later

This post is written by May May Leung, PhD, RD is an assistant professor at the CUNY School of Public Health at Hunter College.  Her research expertise includes the development and evaluation of innovative health communication and community-based interventions to prevent childhood obesity.

Photo credit: optimumwellness.com

Photo credit: optimumwellness.com

With the recent blocking of Mayor Bloomberg’s soda size cap, perhaps it’s worth revisiting the role that sugar plays in affecting health outcomes.  In one of my previous posts, I presented a summary of evidence, which suggests that sugary drinks may be a cause of obesity. More recent publications in Pediatrics and The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition continue to support this notion-one study found that Australian children who consumed more than one sugary drink per day were 34% more likely to be overweight, while another study found an association between consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and type II diabetes risk in French women.

I’m currently working with New York City youth on a public health project and have been hearing some interesting comments from the kids, who talk about the joy and “high” they feel when consuming sugar. One of them said consuming soda is “like being in Heaven.” Another referred to a “sugar rush” his family members get while eating sweets: “they just gotta…keep eating it ‘til they are stuffed.”  Such comments seem to support what the food industry has acknowledged, in a recent New York Times article, about the nature of formulating sugar-containing packaged products.

Food corporations have invested much time and resources into the development of highly preferred tastes, preferably with “bliss point” qualities.  For instance,by increasing the sweetness of their pre-packaged Lunchables, Kraft made this processed lunch option a great success among youth and adults alike. At one point, their Maxed Out tray contained an equivalent of 13 teaspoons of sugar. Yoplait increased the sugar content of its unsweetened yogurt snack to more than five teaspoons per serving, which is actually comparable to the amount in a Starbucks’ cheesecake brownie.

In view of this information, it’s not surprising that people who consume sodas and sugary snacks may find it difficult to stop at only one serving.  As the evidence of the relationship between adverse health outcomes and sugar intake continues to build, it seems that Bloomberg’s soda cap could have been an important step in helping people control the amount of sugary drinks they consume, thus supporting healthier behaviours and ultimately healthier lives.

Ten Years Later: Accountability for the Iraq War’s Civilian Dead

Exhibit B of the Army report on “INVESTIGATION INTO CIVILIAN CASUALTIES RESULTING FROM AN ENGAGEMENT ON 12 JULY 2007 IN THE NEW BAGHDAD DISTRICT OF BAGHDAD, IRAQ”

Jim Stubenrauch is a CHMP senior fellow.

It’s fitting that the 10th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, a milestone passed this week, would occasion some soul-searching among those who supported the war as well as those who opposed it. How many of the war’s stated goals—other than the removal of Saddam Hussein—have been accomplished? And at what cost, in blood and treasure, to the people of Iraq and the nations comprising the coalition, the U.S. foremost among them? It’s debatable whether Americans are safer than we were in 2003; are the Iraqis who survived the war any better off?

It seems obvious that a clear understanding of how many Iraqi civilians were killed, wounded, and displaced in the conflict would be necessary to answer these questions, and it’s symptomatic of our current political predicament that these basic facts remain elusive. How can policymakers and the American people judge the success or failure of the mission if we haven’t taken accurate measure of the human cost of the war—or come to grips with the most accurate measures we have? And have mainstream news organizations done all they should in making the facts known?

When the last U.S. combat troops left Iraq in December 2011, even the New York Times and National Public Radio—two news organizations often charged with having a “liberal bias”—settled on “more than 100,000” when reporting the number of Iraqi civilians killed in the war (NPR’s All Things Considered repeated the same figure this past weekend). But several studies that used the best epidemiologic methods available had already reported much higher estimates.

The March 16 issue of the Lancet (subscription necessary) contains several important articles that aim “to crystallise Iraq’s current health situation, to clarify its most pressing health problems, and to offer a prognosis for the future health of the country.” A short article by Frederick Burkle, Jr. and Richard Garfield, “Civilian Mortality after the 2003 Invasion of Iraq,” performs a great service in untangling the knotty history of several highly contested mortality counts of the past decade. They show how the studies’ findings were resisted for political reasons and they compare the methods and estimates of the most important studies, including the ongoing Iraq Body Count Project (which uses passive surveillance methods, primarily media reports of killings) and the Lancet’s own controversial mortality surveys of 2004 and 2006 (which used active surveillance methods). (Burkle, now at the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, was the first interim minister of public health in Iraq in 2003; Garfield, at Columbia University’s Schools of Nursing and Public Health, was a coauthor of the 2004 Iraq mortality survey.)

The two Lancet reports were based on random cross-sectional cluster sampling surveys, the standard epidemiologic approach to obtaining casualty estimates in conflict zones. The first, published in 2004, found that 100,000 Iraqis had already been killed in the war; the risk of violent death was 58 times higher than it was before the war, and the majority of the dead were women and children killed in air strikes. The second study, published in 2006, estimated that 655,000 excess deaths had occurred because of the war; of these, more than 600,000 were violent deaths. And while the proportion of deaths attributed to coalition forces had diminished, the actual numbers of those killed by the coalition had increased each year. (While there were some problems with the methodology of the two studies, the findings of the second, say the authors, are remarkably consistent with the first. Here’s one of many contemporaneous news articles about the controversy ignited by the publication of the 2006 report.) In light of these statistics, the estimates repeated by the Times and NPR—in 2011 and just the other day—look woefully inadequate.

Burkle and Garfield note that Iraq continues to struggle with a public health emergency. At the conclusion of their article, they write

In truth, because of the politicization and perceived weaknesses of the methods of the Iraq studies, all the studies of civilian death have been discounted or dismissed, yet if half a million civilians have perished, that information should be known. The only accurate death records are of US and coalition forces. Public health data, once untouchable, are increasingly controlled by political decision makers. They cannot have it both ways in defining the ground truth; in every war, combatant forces of states and the leaders they serve must be accountable.

Healthstyles Liz Seegert on NYC’s Senior Planet: Aging with Attitude

Healthstyles Thursday, March 14 11:00 PM to 11:30 PM

Senior Fellow Liz Seegert launches our new segment, HealthCetera. Health reporter Seegert regularly reports on seniors, technology, and the digital divide.

Older adults face unique obstacles in today’s technology dependent world.  Not only must they contend with vision, hearing, and other physical limitations, but for many, there are also psychological barriers to overcome. However, learning to use computers and other digital tools has been shown to have tremendous health benefits, in addition to practical ones.

senior-planet-logoSenior Fellow Liz Seegert reports on the country’s first technology focused learning center, just for seniors, to help them bridge the digital divide. Senior Planet Exploration Center is located at 127 West 25th Street, in Manhattan’s Chelsea neighborhood.

So tune in Thursday, March 14 to WBAI, 99.5 FM (www.wbai.org) at 11:00 PM or listen to it SENIOR PLANET STORY (1)

Healthstyles is sponsored by the Center for Health, Media & Policy at Hunter College, City University of New York.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,852 other followers

%d bloggers like this: